Showing posts with label National Collegiate Athletic Association. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National Collegiate Athletic Association. Show all posts

Friday, June 10, 2011

Terrelle Pryor's Lawyer Sure Likes Hearing Himself Talk

You know, if I hear one more report that starts with "Terrelle Pryor's lawyer says..." I just might be inclined to kick someone in the shins. Seriously, this Larry James guy needs to stop talking and unless Terrelle Pryor is planning on suing some damn body—and not just intimating at doing so—I am completely confused as to why he needs this lawyer representing him any further.

Pryor isn't going to the NFL, the CFL, or the AFL (is there still an AFL)? He's not returning to Ohio State, nor is he planning to transfer to a Division II school to finish out his eligibility. Soooooo, someone with more sense than myself—and I freely admit that said sense can be questionable at times—why on earth this kid, who is poor and struggling, needs a lawyer speaking on his behalf about the idiocy of his choices.

Is he going to sue Ohio State? The NCAA? The tattoo guy who sold his signature for extra cheese (that's money for those who don't know)? Jim Tressell? Seriously, why does Larry James need to be given any type of platform whatsoever for a kid who, to be quite honest, is about as relevant to the sport of football right now as Maurice Clarett is to the Mormon Tabernacle Choir.

Of course some might say that Pryor has every right to retain a lawyer to act on his behalf if he so chooses. After all, he isn't harming anyone by letting this guy take the spotlight and voice his concerns in an intelligent manner—is he?

True enough, but when said representative lawyer starts painting the NCAA as slave master, then you might need to tell him to sit his ass down—just saying.

Good grief, what is it with these athletes and their handlers comparing their plights to slavery? Do any of them actually know anything about slavery? They can't possibly know much because for them to compare their particular issue to that of those who were whipped, hung, beaten, raped, and demoralized for the better part of their existence is asinine and repulsive.

I realize this came from Larry James' mouth and not Terrelle Pryor's, but you can see the danger in that being the case when you aren't speaking for yourself, can't you?

I truly hope Pryor has chosen his representation wisely because it seems to me that his lawyer is a bit of a ham and that's never a good thing—all talk, no action, and plenty of press will get you 15 minutes and a set of steak knives—quit while you're ahead Mr. James. The clock is definitely ticking.  


Wednesday, June 8, 2011

If Maurice Clarett Is The Voice of Reason, Then Hell Just Froze Over

Maurice Clarett, former Ohio State bad boy and NFL wanna-be, has shared his two cents on the Terrelle Pryor situation and he made it very clear that it's not all Ohio State's fault that it cannot keep an eye on it's athletes. Said Clarett, "Anything that any player goes and gets is all based on him and who he meets in the community. The coaches and the university have no control over what the young guy's doing [emphasis added]".

Okay, while it's easy to buy his point based on what has happened at Ohio State in the past year under former head coach Jim Tressel, I am not willing to concede that all coaches are knowingly recruiting and cultivating selfish, entitled, and misinformed athletes that have no understanding of the risks they are taking when they meet up with "community" folks who may want to give them free stuff.

Don't get me wrong, I completely understand that most athletes are not from the best backgrounds and, as Colt McCoy's wife so aptly pointed out in a radio interview this past week, it can be difficult to turn down money, gifts, and other necessary items when you're struggling to find enough money to eat a decent meal on the weekend, but this is essentially what these athletes sign up for when they make the decision to play football for that particular university—right or wrong—most of them know the situation they will be facing for the next 3-5 years.

No one forces these guys to play college football and, as much as it would be easy to feel sorry for the position they are placed in—making millions for a football program which grants them nothing but notoriety in return—at the end of the day, they still are more fortunate than most.

Here's the cut and dry of it: the college football athlete is idolized. If he's a superstar, there is no question his experience as a college student-athlete is better than that of his counterparts. Even more, if said athlete plays well, lives up to expectations, and becomes the guy everyone expects him to be, he reaps the benefits of his hard work when he's drafted into the pros—where he can potentially make millions of dollars and garner endless amounts of fame. 

That said, it's difficult for the average Joe who watches these guys develop and become the heroes they worship on Saturday to look at their situation and say they feel sorry for them.

On the other hand, logic dictates that you understand the quandary that these same same athletes face when they see their jersey number in the stands or their likeness on a video game and come to the realization that the NCAA and university they have sworn to obey and respect the rules of are the same ones that profit off their name and likeness—in perpetuity.

That's a hard pill to swallow as well, I'm sure. 

But, back to Clarett's statement about Ohio State not having any control, we cannot as college football fans accept that our athletes have the right to run amok and afoul of the law. Their actions hurt not only the programs we cheer for and love, but the reputations of all the athletes who continue to do the right thing each season—regardless of the hardship it may cause.

All of these guys aren't breaking laws and taking advantage of the benefits of being a college football player and it is because of them that it's hard to justify the actions of those who do as anything other than selfish.

Terrelle Pryor and others like him have to be the exception and not the rule in college football, otherwise the system is far more broken than any of us truly know. And, if it is broken, then it's high time the NCAA do a better job of fixing it or else they are as much an enabler to these acts of entitlement as those who do the enticing in the first place.

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Forget Terrelle Pryor, Ohio State Has Bigger Problems

I don't know how many people were actually surprised by the announcement that Terrelle Pryor wouldn't be tossing the football around for Ohio State in 2011, but I can definitely say that—to me—it would have been a bigger surprise had he decided to return.

Let's keep it real here folks, Pryor was already suspended for the first five games of the season, Tressell (his ultimate enabler) was out, and it was looking like Pryor himself was heading for a Reggie Bush style ambush of his own. So, in short, he would have been a damned fool to stay in Columbus for another season. 

Of course those who are in the "man-up and face the music camp" would say that he [Pryor] is a punk for leaving in the midst of such turmoil and he should stay and face the music—take his punishment from the NCAA like a man.

Well, considering this is the same kid who was cool trading sigs (signatures) for tats, I'm not sure why anyone would think he would do such a thing. I mean, be honest with yourself, would you sit around and wait for the hammer to drop on you and your team? Especially when it's looking more and more likely that the hammer that's dropping will look a lot more like a machete than a mallet?

Just saying.

Quite frankly, Ohio State has much bigger problems than losing it's head coach and it's star player. I mean that program is a mess—or as this Southerner might say—a hot mess. The situation at Ohio State won't end well, folks.

I suspect those fans and pundits who saw the punishment USC got handed after it was determined that Reggie Bush ran afoul of the law, will be looking for something close to or harsher than that for Ohio State given the obvious lack of institutional control.

That sweater-vest wearing snake, Jim Tressell, got off easy if you ask me. He'll be persona non grata for a while, but give him a couple years to shake the dirt off and you'll see some AD on a podium somewhere giving a speech about how Tressell knows how to win and will be a great asset to XYZ University—that's just the way the cookie crumbles.

As for the Buckeyes, they need to start figuring out how to save their football program—what's left of it—as I foresee some 2012 prospects jumping ship very soon and would be surprised if any reputable coach would be willing to walk into such chaos without being paid very, very, very well.

Furthermore, even if they do find  a fool guy to coach this team beyond the 2011 season, what kid will want to play in Columbus?

Unfortunately, these days, it's all about exposure for the top prospects in the country. They want bowl swag and ESPN glory and if there's any sign that Ohio State will miss out on one, or both, expect those prospects to look elsewhere.

Again, that's the way it is. I simply can't imagine many top flight high school players who will want to sign up for a program that is obviously heading down the highway to hell.

Of course, the NCAA could continue to surprise us all by being completely incompetent in their dealings with Ohio State—let them off with nothing more than a seasonal bowl ban and a loss of scholarships over the next two seasons. Ya know, some BS like that. That, unfortunately, wouldn't surprise me either.

In the meantime, people will continue to speculate on what Pryor will do because, well, he was good enough to start at Ohio State and showed flashes of brilliance here and there. Truthfully, though, he's not ready to be an NFL prospect and if he were anywhere near worthy of a first or second round flyer this past season, he would have come out this year.

Either way, he's in trouble and won't come out of this debacle completely unscathed.

Man, what a year for college football scandals and it's not even July.


Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Steve Spurrier Wants To Give Players Food and Beer Money

Okay, so the headline above sort of wreaks of attention-seeking behavior but, oh well.

 I read where Steve Spurrier extended his voice, and his pockets, towards the "pay-for-play" debate. Apparently, the Ol' Ball Coach is for giving a few dollars to his players for a job well done—$300 per game to be exact.

Over the course of one season, assuming you are allowed to carry a full 70 man roster, you would be giving out roughly $21,000 per game or about $250,000+ per season.

Now, for a guy that makes $2.8 million per year like Spurrier does, that's a drop in the bucket, but you shouldn't be surprised if every other coach in the conference isn't willing to jump on board the money train. That said, his idea is less about the money than it is about the conversation: Should the NCAA allow universities to start paying players for what they do for college football programs both on and off the field?

I, for one, have been on the fence with this one. Well, wait, I was on the fence until I saw what happened to former Georgia receiver, A.J. Green.

Green, in case you forgot, was forced to serve a four-game suspension by the NCAA after it was determined that he sold his Independence Bowl game jersey for $1000 to some agent-type (an offense that I am still scratching my head over. I mean, it's not like he was trading his signature for tattoos or anything).

Once the suspension was handed down, I felt bad for Green, bad for coach Richt, bad for the fans, and bad for Georgia because one of their most prized commodities was being forced to sit out because he sold something that belonged to him. I mean I've heard rumors that certain players are told to give up their game jerseys after each game so that memorabilia dealers can sell them at their stores for top dollar. I don't know what kind of kickback the university or the NCAA gets for such a sale, but you can see where this might be considered a little shady.

However, Spurrier is merely proposing coaches spread the wealth a bit. After all, he says, if not for the performance of the players on the field, there would be no million dollar contracts for coaches in the SEC.

I get what he's saying and I can definitely see where he is going with his argument, but it's not something that's likely to happen so long as it's not possible in every sport at the college level—both male and female—because too many people are still willing to believe that their sport is every bit as important as football.

It kind of makes you wonder, though, with all the forgiveness in Spurrier's heart for the oft-suspended Stephen Garcia, if he's funded a few of the beer-guzzling quarterback's all-night excursions himself. Or maybe he just didn't want to answer any questions about why he's for over-signing. Or maybe, he's just trying to be a pot-stirrer (he's always been good at that)...or maybe he's just, well, who knows what he's doing? Either way, this conversation is being had yet again.

Friday, May 27, 2011

Friday Links: Jim Brown Thinks The NCAA "Starves Kids To Death"

Immediate hat tip goes to ECDawg of The Leather Helmet Blog as I have usurped the link style he uses for his ever-so-popular, Dawg Daily series. Hop on over and see what he's doing—I promise you won't be disappointed.

Now, on with the show. Oh, and have a safe and happy Memorial Day weekend!

1. Georgia is spending the money to find the top talent in the country. ($$$)
In the past three years to date, Georgia has spent a total of $118,256 on various services to provide Mark Richt's program with information, videos, statistical information, and more, on prospective student athletes.
Some it is as simple as reading interviews with the "PSA"s, as they are called in official NCAA terms, conducted by media outlets, in other instances it is exclusive video, and in others information about grades and other details about prospects.

2. Former NFL great and college football legend, Jim Brown, thinks the NCAA is hypocritical.
He said the organization is creating problems with rules that fill its coffers and leave many college athletes destitute without enough money to buy lunch.
"They starve kids to death and make it illegal for (college athletes) to make $3 to buy food, and they make all this money. So I am not a fan of the NCAA and the way they conduct themselves," Brown said. "It’s an elitist organization, and I think they need to change tremendously."

3. Georgia gets a little revenge against Auburn...on the baseball diamond.
The loss left Auburn (29-29) with a non-winning record, meaning they are ineligible for the NCAA tournament. The win kept the NCAA tournament chances alive for the Bulldogs (29-29). They will play on Friday the loser of Thursday's Vanderbilt-South Carolina game.

4. Robert Nkemdiche talks Georgia and why he decided to stick with Ole Miss.
Coach Richt called my coach about me, and wanted to bring me up for a visit,"Denzel told the AJC. "My coach told him thanks for calling, but that I had already decided to go with Ole Miss. It was too late." Denzel said he would’ve taken an official visit to UGA had the Bulldogs scheduled it for earlier, or within the last couple of weeks.  The last time Denzel spoke directly to UGA’s coaches, he said he was invited to take a recruiting trip on Tuesday, May 31 — which is the same day he was scheduled to report to Ole Miss for the summer school session.

5. Stewart Mandel thinks Alabama, not Oklahoma, should be Preseason No. 1—not that it matters. 

No disrespect to the Sooners, who return the bulk of last year's 12-2, Big 12 championship squad, but the best team in the country this fall will be the Alabama Crimson Tide. Frankly, it's a bit baffling that this isn't a more common sentiment.
....Alabama is loaded. Longtime NFL talent evaluator Gil Brandt recently rated seven Tide players among his top 65 prospects for the 2012 draft. This year's Alabama squad bears fewer household names, but it will be more talented and experienced than last year's -- and last year's team wasn't too shabby, despite what its fourth-place SEC West finish would seem to indicate.
6. Former Ohio State players go after their own (it's getting ugly, folks).
Small's comments to The Lantern about memorabilia sales, special car deals and a disregard for NCAA rules drew some strong responses on Twitter from his former Ohio State teammates. Several players criticized Small for speaking out against the program and breaching the team bond.

Here are some responses:


Ohio State C Mike Brewster (played with Small in 2008-09)


  • @Brewster50: He isn't a part of the sacred brotherhood anymore...never on time, never accountable, never sacrificed for the team. Can you trust his word?
  • @Brewster50: Show me a coward and I will show you ray small
  • @Brewster50: I made my name by hard work-blood-sweat and tears...he made his name today...by selling lies to the lantern..enough said..workout time!!
7. ...And speaking of liars and cheats...
What those who run the university apparently do not fear is continuing to employ a football coach who:

    * Lied to the NCAA in September.
    * Lied twice more to school investigators in December.
    * Attempted to cover up those lies until forced to admit to them by a search of his email records in January.
    * Lied at the March 8 news conference to announce he had lied previously.
    * Didn't publicly apologize that night for lying, as he was ordered to do by the NCAA.
    * Lied again at a speaking engagement six days later.

Encompassed in all of Tressel's lying was a breach of his contract with Ohio State, which gave the school all the ammunition it needed to fire him for cause and, thus, would owe him nothing.
8. Coach Richt isn't too worried about Florida coach, Will Muschamps "guarantee".
"I thought that was a good thing coming from him," Richt said with a laugh when asked about Muschamp's guarantee. "I heard about it right away, but I also know how those things happen. That's why I don't answer some questions."
9.  Auburn pulling out all the stops for Big Cat weekend
The last two Big Cats have helped Auburn finish in the Top 3 in recruiting nationally, at least according to some recruiting websites, the last two years.

Luper, Auburn's running backs coach and recruiting coordinator, said Big Cat is different than most recruiting weekends.  

"The recruits get an opportunity to bond like none other because at most places they're running, they're jumping, they're doing some type of agility and physical activity. There is none of that here," Luper said. "There is essentially no football. We use it as an opportunity for recruits to get to know one another, our players, our coaches. For us, it's just a big family reunion." 
10. Former NFL running back, Tiki Barber, is talking stupid again.
Tiki Barber hasn't taken the football field yet in his comeback, but he's already taking hits for making an analogy to Holocaust victim Anne Frank.
The former New York Giants running back has been criticized in local media for making the analogy during an interview in this week's Sports Illustrated.
At one point in the article, Barber describes going into hiding with his girlfriend after his well-publicized breakup with his then-pregnant wife. Barber and his girlfriend ended up in the attic of the home of the player's agent, Mark Lepselter.
"Lep's Jewish," Barber told Sports Illustrated. "And it was like a reverse Anne Frank thing."

 


Sunday, April 10, 2011

Georgia Bulldogs: Tough Break for Trinton, What's Next for Georgia?

Photo Credit: DAVID MANNING
Trinton Sturdivant is out for the 2011season. He tore the anterior crucial ligament (ACL) in his right knee during Saturday's scrimmage and will spend the next year rehabbing.

Because Sturdivant took a medical redshirt in 2008—a player who uses his redshirt season for medical reasons is eligible to apply for a medical hardship year—he could possibly receive a sixth year of eligibilty from the NCAA based on his circumstances.
Medical Hardship Waivers

In order to be eligible for a medical hardship waiver, a student-athlete must have competed in at least one contest in the first half of the season, but no more than three contests or 30%, whichever is greater (14.2.4). The total number of contests is calculated by the schedule on the first date of competition. Participation in Conference postseason is counted as one competition.

If a student-athlete is unable to compete at all during an entire season because of an injury or illness, the student-athlete may not file for a medical hardship waiver. In this case, the season would be considered a medical redshirt season.

If the student-athlete has two or more seasons of medical redshirt because of an injury or illness (or one season of medical redshirt and one season of medical hardship), the Compliance Office can file for an extension of the five-year clock (a sixth year) only after the student-athlete has reached the end of the existing five-year clock [emphasis added].
However, much of this seems unlikely given Sturdivant's flirtation with the NFL this past season. He may want to take this opportunity to get strong and apply for next year's draft in hopes of having a ahot at playing in the pros.

We'll have to wait and see what happens here, but it's most likely Sturdivant has played his last game at the University of Georgia.

That said, the next question is what will Georgia do at left tackle?

Cordy Glenn appears to be the best option as he has experience playing the position, but if he moves from right tackle—a position he is admittedly more comfortable playing—Georgia will have to find someone to take his place. Some choices, according to Anthony Dasher of UGASports.com, would be Austin Long, Kolton Houston, and Justin Anderson.

Kolton Houston is a redshirt freshman with plenty of talent, but he seems best built to play offensive guard due to his average pass-blocking skills. He has impressed offensive line coach, Will Friend, in practices thus far, but it seems doubtful he would be ready to play right tackle this season. That said, he has gotten some looks all across the line this spring and remains a legitimate option—even if only as a reserve.

Justin Anderson has moved back to the offensive line after one season of trying his wares on defense, and while he's adjusted well to being back in his natural element, he's practiced solely at guard this spring. Add to that, Anderson has a lengthy injury history—he missed a majority of 2010 with a turf toe—and may not be physically ready for the rigors of playing on the outside.

Austin Long is the wild card of this bunch. He was highly touted when he arrived at Georgia, but has been besieged by injuries and hasn't contributed much. This is his first spring of really giving it a go and he's already had to miss some time with a sore shoulder.

Those are Georgia's best options for the moment, but there is still the possibility they could find their solution when the 2011 signees enroll—Watts Dantzler, Zach DeBell, and Xzavier Ward among them.

Looks like coach Friend has a lot more work yet to do this spring.

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Former Auburn Player Not Impressed With HBO's Choice of Interviewees

You have to love Twitter for it's ability to catch the instantaneous thoughts of it's Tweeters.

Kody Bliss, a former punter for the Auburn Tigers—yes, the punter—had this to say about the guys HBO chose to interview for the expose on Auburn:

I guess Mr. Bliss would know a dummy if he saw one, he was an academic standout at Auburn—sporting a 3.45 cumulative GPA in marketing as a student there.

Bliss didn't stop there, he went on to say this about Stanley McClover:

I don't know if that clears things up or not, but I suspect the HBO story will get more interesting by the day as more people weigh in on it's participants and the motives behind them coming forward—particularly Chaz Ramsey who sued the athletic department at Auburn in 2009. His case was dismissed in February.

Rumor has it, the restaurant/bar where Ramsey works has been boycotted by some of the Auburn faithful until the owner fires him—hope this kid has a backup plan...outside of Auburn, that is.





Auburn Football: HBO Special Looks Damning, But Proves Nothing

Stanley McClover
The internet was abuzz late yesterday after portions of an HBO program—airing tonight—were leaked by the website, SportsByBrooks. In the segment, four former Auburn football players go on-the-record and say they were paid by the school to both secure and keep their services.

While all four players had plenty of dirt to dish, some of the more eyebrow-raising statements came from the mouth of Stanley McClover, a former defensive star, who stated that he switched his commitment from Ohio State to Auburn after receiving a bookbag full of money. 

Here is how McClover described the incident to Andrea Kremer:
Kremer voiceover: “McClover says what he asked for was money. A lot of it. And that he got it. Delivered in a bookbag, exact amount unknown.”
Kremer to McClover: “You opened it up, what are you thinking?
McClover: “I almost passed out. I literally almost passed out I couldn’t believe it was true. I felt like I owed them.”
Kremer to McClover: “You felt obligated to them (Auburn)?
McClover: “I felt totally obligated.”
Kremer to McClover: “Because of the money?
McClover: “Yeah.
As wild as that sounds, McClover isn't bringing anything new to the table where accusations about pay-to-play at Auburn is concerned.

Former head coach, Terry Bowden, expressed a similar account in 2001—although it would be two-years before anyone knew of his statements—when he told a reporter "They [Auburn Boosters] were paying players cash, $12,000, $15,000 to sign...all I was told to do was shake hands and say, 'Thank you. I appreciate how much you love Auburn."

The collective fingers have been pointing in Auburn's direction for years.

That said, the one thing the HBO expose doesn't seem to offer is the one thing that would make this story the most damning—proof.

You can hate the Auburn Tigers all you want, but until the fire starts surfacing on all this smoke, it's much ado about nothing. And if you think NCAA investigators are on a plane to Auburn at this very moment, don't hold your breath.

Marc Emmert (NCAA's idiot President) already looks like a shill for how he's handle some very high profile cases—Cam Newton, Ohio State, Jim Tressel, etc.—and he's not looking to make any moves towards further tarnishing his already fragile reputation by investigating Auburn based on a few claims by some previous players.

Those accusations will need to be accompanied by something more valid—a paper trail, a name, or a tape would be a nice start—before this debacle takes on the shape of something more than just a witch hunt.

That's just being honest.

In the end, it's another blemish on Auburn's resume—at least in the court of public opinion—but when you get right down to it, without proof, this is just another juicy story.




The NCAA: Oh What A Tangled Web You Weave...



"The NCAA is amazing...every time you turn around, they come up with something new to ensure that the young men that have poured their hearts and souls and energy and intellect into their craft are continually kept at a disadvantage when everybody else around them is running to the bank." (Bill Rabinowitz, Columbus Dispatch, 12/24/10)

The comments above were made by the mother of Ohio State wide receiver, DeVier Posey. Posey, if you'll remember, was one of the players suspended by the NCAA for selling his Big Ten Championship ring.

Once the dust settled on the scandal, it was revealed that Posey's mother, Julie, was the reason the ring was sold. The widowed mother of four is constantly struggling to make ends meet and Posey saw no harm in selling his ring to help her out—as Ms. Posey put it, "There's no crime here. None. They're not involved with agents. They didn't steal anything. They didn't borrow anything from anybody. It was theirs. Nobody told them it 'almost belongs to you.' It belonged to them."

While it's easy to empathize with a son who simply wishes to help his mother in any way that he can, it also begs the question (yet again) of who the bad guy truly is in these situations—is it the player or is it the NCAA?

Jason Whitlock, a reporter for FoxSports.com, published an article lashing out at the "greedy" NCAA and it's exploitative nature where collegiate athletes are concerned. The article references the forthcoming HBO Special (airing tonight), "Real Sports With Bryant Gumbel", which speaks of former UCLA basketball star Ed O'Bannon.

O'Bannon has sued the NCAA for the contract he, and thousands of other players have been forced to sign. A contract which states that they are forbidden from earning a dime off their college careers—ever.

Can you imagine that? A player not being granted control over his image, his likeness, or his name—as it applies to his collegiate career—while the NCAA has the ability to do so in perpetuity?

Granted, if this is indeed true, the player is made aware of this before he puts pen to paper. He could always just walk away and leave the scholarship, a chance at collegiate glory, and an opportunity to play at the next level, on the table. He doesn't have to do anything, really.

But, let's be honest, what player is going to walk away from that opportunity? Not many, and both the player and the NCAA are well-aware of this fact.

More and more the NCAA proves itself to be as self-serving and hypocritical as any other monopoly. They aren't governed by any outside entity and haven't, until now, been forced to answer to any one about how they choose to operate. However, at some point, the fit hits the shan and you have to start asking the question of whether or not the NCAA is operating in the best interests of amateurism or in the best interest of itself—especially when more and more, the latter appears to be the case.




Thursday, March 17, 2011

Jim Tressel: Playing The NCAA Like A Fiddle

Photo Credit: Marvin Fong/The Plain Dealer
Listen to this: Jim Tressel has decided to increase his suspension from the paltry, pathetic, and laughable two games that he initially felt was fair to five—like his players.

For those of you who don't remember the story, here's the recap: in January, five of Ohio State's football players were suspended by the NCAA for the first five games of the 2011 season for accepting tattoos in exchange for signed memorabilia. Tressel, at the time, feigned ignorance and said he had no knowledge of what his players were doing. He admonished them for their actions and moved on from the matter with no further commentary.

However, it was recently discovered that not only did Tressel know what was going on with said players, but he hid what he knew from the public as best he could by lying. His reasoning for doing so, he "feared" for the safety of his players.

Ohio State's response to finding out what Tressel did was to suspend him for two-games and fine him $250,000.

Well, obviously, the NCAA isn't looking for anymore criticism from the college football pundits of the world because they told Ohio State and Tressel to shove that two game suspension and come up with something better. Tressel's response, get this, he'll accept five games. The hell you say?...You'll accept five?!? Is that a joke? Surely, Tressel has to understand that his punishment, by virtue of his stature and crime, should be worse than that of his players.

After all, he did lie to the NCAA. Quite frankly, in my humble opinion, anything less than the a season-long suspension isn't worth talking about.

There should be no mercy for him or Ohio State because this isn't a case of, "aw, man, I had no idea". Tressel's actions were committed with full-knowledge of the consequences and he should be held to the fire for his actions.

Now, before we get the folks who'll scream, 'Hey, Lady, you think college football is a clean sport? You think Tressel is the exception and not the rule', let me make this clear, I don't care about the perception of college football. Perception is not the point.

We all understand that coaches break rules, teams cheat, and players can be bought—this isn't me living in a Utopian paradise where those kinds of things never happen. But, if the NCAA doesn't address this situation more forcefully, then why bother having the rules in the first place?

You have to start making an example of coaches at some point and, if that lesson begins with Jim Tressel—so be it.

Tressel should be forced to sit out the season for what he did, anything less is a joke.

Monday, March 14, 2011

Georgia Bulldogs: Wherefore Art Thou, Israel Troupe?

Photo Credit: Kelly Lambert
In case you're a regular reader and were wondering what's up with the "Wherefore Art Thou..." question, here's the deal: its the slow part of the year (as far as college football), so what started out as a cutesy title for an article about Georgia Bulldog defensive back, Jakar Hamilton, is now—for the moment—a weekly profile of players who have failed to live up to expectations.

Now that the housekeeping is out of the way, let's move on to Israel Troupe.

Troupe, a former dual-sport standout for Tift County High School, will enter his senior season with the Georgia Bulldogs in 2011, and his career, to this point, can only be described as unexceptional.

What happened to this prospect who was once recognized as one of the top players in the state? What has played the biggest role in his lack of development? In my opinion, he's never truly given his total effort to playing the game of football.

As a high school senior, Troupe didn't hold gridiron dreams. His love was for baseball and, had he gone as high in the MLB Draft as he would have liked, he likely never would have committed to play football at Georgia. However, he would eventually be selected in the 31st round—effectively making his decision to play football a no-brainer—ending his dreams of playing pro ball before they began. 

Since that time, Troupe has attempted to have one foot in both worlds. Whether he was looking into practicing with the Georgia Baseball team, or considering signing on with the Athens Pirates (an amateur baseball team), Troupe has never been completely focused on football and that has hurt him more than the nagging injuries or the shifting depth chart.

Will he finally be something more than a warm body in a red and black uniform, or will he continue to be a non-factor as he's been in his entire career thus far? 


Wednesday, March 9, 2011

The 10 Most Corrupt College Athletic Programs

Let’s face it, our favorite college athletic programs sometimes feel a need to cheat. According to Insider Higher Ed, almost half of all big-time college sports programs have been punished for major violations by the NCAA during the last decade and these days, even the Ivy League sports programs aren’t immune to major infractions.

That being said, the following programs take the cake for being the most notorious repeat offenders in the game—the blatant cheaters who always seem to have NCAA investigators breathing down their necks. These are the places where the phrase "lack of institutional control" simply becomes redundant:


1. Arizona State — Nine Major Infractions: Most of the Sun Devils' violations have come as a result of wrongdoing within the baseball program—which has been recognized as one of the best in the nation. With former players like Reggie Jackson and Barry Bonds to call their own, ASU is considered one of the premier programs for producing big name talent but, in recent years, they have been a lot less mindful of how they do business in Tempe and, this past December, they were penalized for major secondary violations, resulting in three years probation and a one-year ban from the NCAA postseason. The NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions cited, amongst other things "the improper recruitment of a player, the improper use of student managers during practices, improper benefits given to players for work not done totaling $5,889.34 and impermissibly using a privately owned athletics training facility located on the ASU campus and not paying for those services, valued at approximately $60,000." The litany of problems led to the forced resignation of coach Pat Murphy, who led the Sun Devils to four College World Series appearances.

2. SMU — Eight Major Infractions: Holding the unfortunate distinction of being just one of five programs in NCAA history to suffer the "death penalty", SMU football is still the poster child for corruption in major college athletics. Its capital offense was maintaining a slush fund to pay players from the mid-1970s to the mid-1980s, even when the program was already on probation—from 1974 to 1985—it was penalized on five separate occasions. Because SMU was under such intense scrutiny from the NCAA, the powers that be had little choice but to levy the harshest penalty. As a result, the 1987 and 1988 season were canceled, 55 scholarships were stripped away, and the team was permitted to hire just five full-time assistant coaches—instead of the regular nine—and the program was crippled for almost two decades.

3. Auburn — Seven Major Infractions: Seven major infractions for now, anyway, but the Cam Newton situation aside, Auburn has had a difficult time playing by the rules over the years. Its most embarrassing incident occurred in 1991, when 60 Minutes aired recordings of head football coach Pat Dye arranging a loan for a player. The series of incriminating tapes were provided by former star defensive back Eric Ramsey and unveiled a pay-for-play scheme involving the coaching staff and prominent booster "Corky" Frost. For its wrongdoing, Auburn received a two-year bowl ban, a one-year television ban, and lost 13 scholarships over a four-year period. Dye was replaced by Terry Bowden, who became the first Division 1 coach to go undefeated in his first season.

4. Minnesota — Seven Major Infractions: During his 13-year stint as Minnesota’s head basketball coach, Clem Haskins oversaw runs to the Elite Eight, Final Four and NIT Championship. Today, however, only the Elite Eight appearance remains in the NCAA record books, as everything Haskins accomplished from 1993 forward was vacated. Prior to the Golden Gophers’ appearance in the 1999 NCAA tournament, a former basketball office manager revealed that she had written more than 400 papers for numerous basketball players over several years. Haskins’ contract was bought out over the summer and he later admitted to paying her $3,000 for her work. As the NCAA investigation unfolded, he was accused of paying players, persuading professors to inflate players’ grades and ignoring sexual harassment concerns. The NCAA administered massive sanctions, notably docking five scholarships over three seasons and instituting recruiting limitations. The entire athletic department suffered, as athletic director, associate athletic director, vice president for student development and athletics and academic counselor were all forced to resign due to the scandal.

5. Oklahoma — Seven Major Infractions: Barry Switzer inherited a program on probation—it forfeited nine games from the 1972 season because of violations that resulted from the alteration of players’ transcripts—and left it on probation in 1988. The Sooners garnered the reputation of being an outlaw program in the 1980s. During one rough patch, a shooting and rape occurred in an athletic dorm, a player attempted to sell drugs to an undercover agent, and a player robbed Switzer’s home. The latter player probably didn’t receive personal checks from Switzer, scalped game tickets, free airline tickets, or a boatload of money from a bidding war during his recruitment. All of that happened, and it resulted in a two-year bowl ban, a one-year live television ban, and recruiting restrictions. More recently, Oklahoma’s basketball program was penalized when former basketball coach Kelvin Sampson, the same guy who later crippled the Indiana basketball program due to unethical recruiting practices, made 550 illegal calls to 17 different recruits.

6. Texas A&M — Seven Major Infractions: The Southwest Conference was probably the most corrupt entity in the history of college sports. If you competed in the SWC during the 1980s, and weren’t cheating, you didn’t have a pulse. Not coincidentally, Texas A&M enjoyed quite a bit of success during that decade, winning three consecutive conference titles under Jackie Sherrill. Sherrill resigned in 1988, after the NCAA discovered that assistant coaches and boosters were providing improper benefits to recruits—one was given a sports car and another’s father was offered medical treatment. The Aggies were given two years of probation, banned from the postseason for one season and docked 10 scholarships. Additional violations by the basketball program in 1991 and the football program again in 1994—a booster employed and overpaid nine players who didn’t really work—almost caused A&M to suffer the same fate as SMU did in the late 80's.

7. Wichita State — Seven Major Infractions: Programs from smaller conferences are just as capable of skirting the rules as the big boys. Although Wichita State doesn’t have a football program, its baseball and basketball programs have flourished. The baseball program has been one of the most successful in recent history, winning the 1989 College World Series and finishing second in 1982, 1991, and 1993. The basketball program reached the Final Four in 1965, Elite Eight in 1981 and Sweet Sixteen in 2006. Of the program’s seven infractions, perhaps the most disheartening one occurred in 1982, not long after the team reached the Elite Eight. Violations involving promises of cash and airline tickets resulted in the stripping of two basketball scholarships over two seasons and a ban from both the NCAA tournament and the NIT. At the time the penalties were imposed, Wichita State led the NCAA in major infractions.

8. Wisconsin — Seven Major Infractions: Just months after its basketball program reached the Final Four in 2000, the Wisconsin athletic department was embroiled in controversy. Twenty-six football players were suspended, prior to the season opener, after the NCAA uncovered that members of the Badgers’ football and basketball teams were given special credit arrangements at a shoe store. A year later, Wisconsin began serving five years of probation—which included scholarship reductions in both football and basketball—for giving recruiting inducements and extra benefits, as well as an overall failure to properly monitor its athletic program. The Badgers have managed to survive the last decade without any other major violations, and the football and basketball programs have continued to enjoy consistent success.

9. Florida State — Seven Major Infractions: Former rival coach Steve Spurrier once referred to FSU as Free Shoes University, a zinger derived from a 1993 scandal in which nine Florida State players went on an agent-funded shopping spree at Foot Locker. Six years later, during a national championship run, all-American wide receivers, Peter Warrick and Laveranues Coles, were charged with felony grand theft for receiving $412.38 worth of clothes from a Dillard’s cashier for which they only paid $21.40. Warrick was suspended for two games and Coles from thrown off the team. In 2009, Bobby Bowden was forced to vacate 12 victories because of an academic cheating scandal that also involved the men’s and women’s basketball, baseball, softball and men’s track and field programs–a 2007 men’s track national championship was vacated as well. The penalties ensured Bowden wouldn’t catch Joe Paterno as the FBS’s all-time winningest coach.

10. Memphis — Seven Major Infractions: The good feelings that accompanied Memphis State’s 1985 Final Four run diminished in the ensuing years as karma, tragedy and bad luck befell various members of the team and coaching staff: head coach Dana Kirk was fired in 1986 after the NCAA uncovered recruiting violations and vacated the 1985 Final Four appearance, he later served a prison term for tax evasion, a crime he committed while he served as the head coach. Star center William Bedford was drafted sixth overall in the 1986 NBA draft, but his career was derailed by drug addiction, and he’s currently serving a 10-year prison sentence. Reserve guard Aaron Price was killed in a carjacking in 1998. Small forward Baskerville Holmes committed a murder-suicide in 1997 and assistant coach Larry Finch suffered a series of strokes that left him debilitated. However, a bit of healing seemed to be on tap in in 2008, when John Calipari had the Tigers positioned to win the national title. Unfortunately, that great run would later be scrapped from the record books as Memphis was given three years probation by the NCAA for, former star player, Derrick Rose’s fraudulent SAT score and the $1,700 in free travel and lodging provided to his brother. Before penalties were levied, Calipari bolted to Kentucky, which could soon find its way onto this list—the athletic program has six major infractions and the basketball program narrowly escaped the death penalty in 1989.


(This article was reprinted via courtesy of associatesdegree.com).

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Jim Tressel: Your Only "Fear" Was Getting Caught—Period

Listen, full disclosure here, this post is not an attempt at being fair or balanced. No, the approach here is simple: to call a spade a spade. 

Upon reading Jim Tressel's "apology" for failing to report the violations of his players—which, by the way, if you're buying that whole "feared for their safety argument", then I have a wonderful piece of sandy real estate in the north pole to sell you—I only have two observations: 1) Tressel is only sorry he got caught, and 2) Tressel is about as honest as an Amway salesperson if he tries to spin it any other way.

While I won't profess to know all of Tressel's intentions, his decision to withhold information about  the impermissible activities of his players cannot be accepted as an omission prompted by any so-called "fear" of restitution by any third-party. On the contrary, based on the emails exchanged between Tressel and the informant, his players engaged in the behavior, willingly, on multiple occasions—at some points even soliciting Mr. Rife via cell phone contact—and Tressel's response didn't seem to elicit anything more than a passing curiosity as to how he might curb their behavior.

At the press conference, Tressel stated "I have had a player murdered. I've had a player incarcerated. I've had a player get taken into the drug culture and lose his opportunity for a productive life...it was obviously tremendously concerning. Quite honestly, I was scared."

Well, not to sound insensitive, but there are more than a handful of coaches in the college football ranks who share in that experience with Tressel—it explains nothing.

And, even if anyone was naive enough to buy Tressel's stab at emotional sympathy, those same persons would be smart to ask the following question: why not blow the whistle on the whole enchilada once the shady dealings were finally exposed in January? Surely if there were ever a time to let the information highway flow freely, it was then because, well, the cat was out of the bag. Yet, instead, he continued to keep the information to himself—why?

I'll tell you why, he kept it a secret for the same reason then as he did in April of 2010,  he knew he was in deep crapola if any one found out. He was simply trying to protect his and his players backsides—nothing more.

However, the more appalling behavior, in my opinion, comes not from Tressel (unfortunately, dirty coaches appear to be in fashion right now), but from the Ohio State administration in general. Do they honestly believe that a two game suspension coupled with a $250,000 fine is enough?...Seriously?

First of all, the Buckeyes play scrub one and scrub two in the first two games, so it's not like Tressel would have done much coaching in the first place and, furthermore, university president, Gordon Gee, sounds like he's just moments away from grabbing a set of knee pads for ol' Jimmy (good grief, Mr. Gee, could you BE anymore of a sniffer, "I'm just hoping the coach doesn't dismiss me."...is this guy for real?), so it wouldn't surprise me if the $250,000 fine doesn't come out of Tressel's pockets—per se.

NCAA President, Marc Emmert, has already proven to be a complete moron in the way he handles such blatant violations as this one (see Cam Newton as well as the Ohio State Five), so all eyes will be on him again with this latest turn of events and, for his sake, I hope he finds some intelligence in making a ruling on a real punishment for The Ohio State University.

They should be forced to forfeit the entire 2010 season and Jim Tressel should, in my homer humble opinion, be required to sit out more than just a couple of meaningless football games in 2011. The stuff should hit the fan for Ohio State and, if it doesn't, expect most of hell to not only break loose, but to take up permanent residence in Indianapolis—starting with the office of the president. 


Sunday, February 13, 2011

Mark Emmert: Either You Don't Get It Or You're Just Plain Ignorant

Mark Emmert never ceases to amaze the masses with his gift of diplomacy.

In an article, published today, by CBSSports.com, Emmert is quoted to have said the following regarding the whole Cam Newton debacle:
"...Getting it right is often in the eye of the beholder. The cases we saw this fall were highly controversial and highly debatable. I understand that, and some of them were even enormously frustrating to me.

"I said very loud and clear that I think it's absolutely a fundamentally wrong for a father to try to sell the services of his son or daughter to the highest bidder, to a university. We ought never to allow that to happen, but yet, having not anticipated that, we didn't have any rule or structure that said it was a violation of any of our rules. I found that grossly inappropriate that didn't have a structure in which we could say, 'No, you can't do that.' [emphasis added].


"There was no evidence that money had changed hands and there was no evidence that
Auburn University had anything to do with it. We would up making a decision that felt to many people morally objectionable, but that fit the facts and the circumstances.

"We find ourselves making those kinds of judgment calls often." 
Is this guy serious, or what? Correct me, anyone, if I'm wrong, but didn't Southern Methodist University receive the NCAA's "death penalty" for paying players—both on their roster and prospectively as recruits?

Does that not count as a precedent? Surely if a university is not allowed to give money to it's players, then said players handlers should not be allowed to seek payment from the university in order to secure that player's services—it's not a tough jump for a logical person to make.

Granted, there is nothing in the rules that says "parents can't pimp players" but, come on, some of this stuff is common sense and, if nothing else, the act of allowing a "pay-for-play" scheme to go unpunished simply because you want to protect the NCAA's tarnished image under your watch—yes, this means you Mr. Emmert—is an act of irresponsibility.

Emmert certainly has his hands full now, what with all the loopholes people will start to find in the vague, prejudicial rules of the NCAA, but he can thank himself for making his life a lot more difficult at the top.



EA Sports and The NCAA: You Made Your Bed, Now You May Have To Lie In It

I'm no lawyer and there won't be any self-righteous spouting of what the law states and how said law should or could be interpreted—I'm simply not an expert in that arena. However, Sam Keller's lawsuit  against the NCAA and EA Sports does interest me a bit because of the far-reaching effect it could have on college football. 

In a nutshell, Keller—the former star quarterback for Arizona State—is suing EA Sports and the NCAA for monies received as a result of using his likeness in their popular NCAA college football game.

For years, the NCAA has shared "...undisclosed royalties with the NCAA for use of college stadiums, team names and uniforms and the players' images..." while the players, themselves, receive nada.

The case will be argued on this Tuesday in Pasadena and revolves around a ruling made more than a year ago by Judge Claudia Wilken that rejected the notion that the images used in the popular EA Sports games should be protected under the First Amendment.

EA's lawyers argued, at that time, that the depictions are used to "...create works of art much in the same way authors, filmmakers and songwriters insert real people in novels, movies and songs."

Judge Wilken contended that the images were not "transformed" enough to be considered art and, therefore, EA is liable to the plaintiff—in this particular, case, Sam Keller—for damages.

Apparently, under the transformative defense, "a work is considered protected by the First Amendment if it contains "significant transformative elements" or "the value of the work does not derive primarily from the celebrity's fame." 

Obviously, by using all the same characteristics of each player—i.e. height, weight, jersey number, hometown, and college team—EA is not exactly transforming anything. In fact, the only thing missing from the game's version of these players is the name itself which, to be honest, can be altered by the player after purchase.

In other words, EA isn't fooling anyone with their intent. 

So, if that defense holds, what will it mean for the thousands of players who have been basking in the glow of an empty hand for years? Will the NCAA and EA be forced to fork over millions of dollars to not only former players, but current ones as well, for profiting off their likenesses?


That's hard to say at this juncture, but a ruling against the NCAA and EA could open the barn door wide open for other athletes looking to cash in.

Should college athletes be allowed to make money off their names—especially if the NCAA is making billions off of them each year—and be granted the opportunity to say "yes or no" to being marketed and sold against their better judgment? Maybe. Some might say the athlete is already getting paid enough. After all, they receive free room and board, a full scholarship, medical attention, and many outside perks that many will never garner.

However, isn't there a catch-22 inherent in that situation? Don't the universities, at least at competitive Division-I institutions, recoup a great bit of that investment through television and licensing deals that dwarf the actual cost of the scholarship itself?

Doesn't one hand simply wash the other?

Don't misunderstand, I am not about to start advocating issuing paychecks to athletes—there could be a lot more negatives in that than some can imagine—but I am not against seeing a trust fund being made available for them after they've finished their playing careers—that's something that could be particularly helpful for guys who don't have a shot at the pro level.

It's a suit that definitely bears watching, but it's possible that EA has seen it's luck run out on this one—it could finally be time for them to pay the piper or, in this case, the player.

What say you?

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Georgia Bulldogs: Former QB Prospect, Logan Gray, Will Transfer

Logan Gray will no longer play for the University of Georgia.

The former quarterback prospect who began the 2010 campaign as a possible candidate for the starting QB position, only to be moved to wide receiver/flanker once Aaron Murray was named, has decided to take his degree (which he will be awarded in May) and seek out another school at which to use his remaining eligibility (he has one year remaining).

According to DawgPost.com, Gray wants to play his final season at a school closer to his home of Columbia, MO so that his family can come to his games.

I'll admit that I am uncertain if the same loophole that allowed Jeremiah Masoli to play at Ole Miss in 2010 will apply to Gray but, if it does, the NCAA waiver would come with the caveat that the University of Georgia doesn't offer an advanced degree in whatever field he hopes to obtain his Masters.

Would that open the door for him to play for the University of Missouri who, coincidentally, just lost their starting quarterback? Just an idea, nothing confirmed or heard about that possibility as it is just as likely that Gray could go the Division-II route.

Either way, you have to wish the kid nothing but the best. He gave his all at Georgia and it's too bad the coaching staff could never find a spot for him.

He finished last season with 105 receiving yards and things appeared to be looking up in 2011, especially with both A.J. Green and Kris Durham moving on, but his departure will leave Georgia even thinner at receiver, and will put a lot more pressure on guys like Marlon Brown and Rantavious Wooten to, finally, live up to their potential.




Friday, January 7, 2011

College Football: Arkansas Legislators Want New Rules After Newton Scandal

It looks like the lawmakers of Arkansas want to see some major changes in the way sports-agents are penalized for "rogue" behavior—at least by their state.

According to published reports, Attorney General Dustin McDaniel is introducing new legislation that would make it a "Class D felony for agents or their representatives to induce student-athletes to sign a contract by furnishing goods or services of value".

The bill would also "make it illegal for parents or others to seek the same illegal financial benefits in exchange for the promise of a student-athlete's commitment to a college or university athletic program."

Hmmm, sounds like Mr. McDaniel may not be too happy that his alma mater's (no surprise here, it's the University of Arkansas) shot at BCS glory was thwarted by a team many still feel was winning games with a dirty player who should have been deemed ineligible—Auburn.

Not that this was his only motivation for pushing the bill—sponsored by David J. Sanders—said McDaniel,

"Sports agents need to know that we in Arkansas will not tolerate them coming into our state, breaking the law, and jeopardizing the future of our student-athletes...further, we're going to make sure that our kids aren't used as pawns by their parents or others who think they can get away with selling their services to the highest bidder."
Wow, that language sure sounds pointed, no? He goes on to say,
"NCAA penalties could cost the hotel owner in Fayetteville or the convenience store owner in Jonesboro, all because of the actions of some unethical sports agent from outside the state...we support this legislation because we want our local economies to thrive and we want our student-athletes and our universities to be protected. It just makes for a better experience all around when everybody plays by the rules."
Well, not for nothing, Mr. McDaniel, but your head coach isn't exactly a saint himself—just saying.

If put into place, the penalties could be pricey if an agent or agent-representative is found in violation. The current penalty is $50,000 per offense, that would increase to $250,000 under this new law.







Wednesday, December 29, 2010

College Football: Forget Integrity, We Just Want The Money


After the story broke about Ohio State players selling their jerseys and accepting favors, many of us watched and waited to see what the all-mighty NCAA would do to punish the players and the university—at the very least we expected the six offenders to sit for the Sugar Bowl.

Well, what happened instead is yet another example of how the NCAA is just another bully masquerading as an organization of order.

Ohio State was given the option of delaying suspensions until the start of the 2011 season, and now that the representatives of the Sugar bowl have spoken, we know why—money.

Said Sugar Bowl CEO, Paul
Hoolahan,
"I made the point that anything that could be done to preserve the integrity of this year's game, we would greatly appreciate it...that appeal did not fall on deaf ears, and I'm extremely excited about it, that the Buckeyes are coming in at full strength and with no dilution."
Must be nice.

While it's easy to understand Hoolahan's motives—he is a business man after all—it's less easy to explain away the obvious double-standard of the NCAA in this case.

Are they the governing body of college football or not?

A.J. Green sat four games for selling his jersey, Anthony Dasher missed four for taking a $1500 loan, and last season, Dez Bryant missed most of his final season for talking to Deion Sanders...but Ohio State gets the option of delaying punishment because some bowl official doesn't want another lackluster BCS game on his hands?

Nice job of getting tough, Mr. Emmert. Here we thought you were bringing balance to the NCAA—as it's new president—but as it turns out, you just brought a bigger checkbook.

What a joke.



Wednesday, December 1, 2010

NCAA Clears Cam Newton, But Punishes Father—What The Hell?

Here's the gist of the NCAA's conversation with Cam Newton on Tuesday:
NCAA Representative: Your daddy, Cecil, asked for money. 

Cam Newton: I don't know anything about that, sir. 

NCAA Rep: Alrighty then, now that we've cleared that up—good luck on Saturday.
Okay, maybe it didn't happen quite like that, but you have to wonder what the hell the NCAA was thinking when they decided Cam Newton was free of any guilt. Honestly, not to say that any of us were flies on the wall, but Newton's decision to attend Auburn was made by his father—that's been documented.

That said, how likely is it that Cam knew nothing about what his daddy was doing with Mississippi State? Does the NCAA really expect a rational individual to believe that Cecil Newton was pimping his son to the highest bidder, yet his son didn't realize he was being pimped?

If they do, then that's naivete to the fullest extent.

In addition, what kind of horrific precedence does this decision leave for the rest of college football's "amateur" athletes. Should they all just start using the Shaggy defense whenever they're approached about a potential scandal—just say, "it wasn't me":



Seriously, if Auburn saw fit to deem him ineligible on Monday, then there was plenty enough there to keep him that way for more than just 48-hours. This same NCAA took three weeks to investigate A.J. Green's jersey incident, yet they need less than three days to deem Cam Newton fit to play—even with knowledge that his father was soliciting money on his behalf.

That's ridiculous.

If Cam Newton was unaware of what his daddy was doing, fine, then in all honesty, he shouldn't be penalized. However, that's not how the NCAA claims to work. Ignorance of wrong-doing doesn't exempt you from punishment—or so they say. 

In response to the NCAA's decision, SEC Commissioner, Mike Slive had this to say, "The conduct of Cam Newton’s father and the involved individual is unacceptable and has no place in the SEC or in intercollegiate athletics...the actions taken by Auburn University and Mississippi State University make it clear this behavior will not be tolerated in the SEC."

(scratches head)...How exactly does it do that, Mike? All this proves is that if you're doing well and making the NCAA, and the SEC a ton of money, we're willing to overlook your transgressions. If Auburn were 0-11, and not in the BCS picture, would the outcome have been as favorable?

Lets be honest here, this is as much about the SEC maintaining its foothold as it is about doing things the right way. The NCAA, the SEC, nor the Heisman Trophy committee give a rats patoot about Cam Newton or his daddy. They just don't want another Reggie Bush situation on their hands this soon—they're protecting themselves from the negative backlash such a decision could have caused.

Nothing more.

Shame on them all for being the biggest pimps in college football.

One thing is certain, if Auburn goes on to win this weekend and compete for a national title, there will be changes to the NCAA's rules prior to the 2011 season. The loopholes their mind-boggling act leaves in its wake are too obvious to be overlooked, and they cannot allow them to remain if they expect any integrity to be maintained in this sport.

That is, of course, assuming there ever was any.




Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Auburn Fans Respond: Nick Fairley Was Just Doing His Job (VIDEO)

Ya know, this would be funnier if it weren't so dead wrong. Of course, have to admit, the dialogue does give a slight chuckle in some places—particularly the "All Auburn fans should be killed" retort by the "Georgia" fan.

For the most part, though, it just amazes me how differently two sides can see a ball game.



Here's to killing Auburn, on the football field, next year in Athens!
Enhanced by Zemanta